Just very briefly, Mr. Chair, there are two things.
One, of course, is that your conclusion was that it was questionable whether something happened and therefore, in the interest of erring on the side of greater caution, the apology was required. I want that to be clear for the record.
Secondly, it may be instructive for us. I don't know how we can develop a process for discussing a potential brief such that we don't create further breaches along the way. Maybe that's something you can consider with some suggestion to the committee, or that the committee could take up at some future point, but creating a process whereby we can do that without creating further problems or even venturing into grey areas would be instructive.