If I understand your intervention correctly, we're trying to avoid indiscriminate use of stereotyping simply because we think a particular ethnicity might be a higher risk. I was talking about the specific instance where there might be a credible piece of information. You'd referred to collecting data on discretionary decisions being made by front line personnel, and some other things.
Presumably the collecting of data would be the substantiation that there is a credible piece of intelligence to form the basis of a temporary use.... That's more what I was getting toward.
I guess we could move on to behavioural analysis, which would not be the same as involving, as you've stated, any type of racial or ethnic profiling. We're talking about somebody's behavioural characteristics--whether they are exhibiting stress, and those types of factors that might give rise to consideration for security.
You said that behavioural analysis was not a prohibited ground and therefore wouldn't be considered. But that's not the same as offering an opinion about whether you consider it should be a prohibited ground.
I don't know if you want to venture into that one or not.