That means, from what I gather and from what I've interpreted as what you and others have said, that you want a greater presence by the regulator. In fact, you actually want the regulator to come back into the collective agreement, especially as it relates to the issues about pilot fatigue and the number of hours you're allowed to travel, to be on call, and to do all kinds of things.
It's troubling; I think the general public might be tempted to ask you a question. It sounds a little flippant, but it's a legitimate question. You have a room full of documentation about the perils of pilot fatigue. I'm assuming you also have a room full of information regarding other threats to security. How serious is one relative to the other? Which is more a danger to the travelling public: pilot fatigue or the risks that are documented, in part by the popular press and in part by a government determined to spend more money on national security?