The initiative of developing best practices inside the helicopter association has been going on for about two and a half years. We have two or three best practices that are final now and available to our members, and there are about four or five that are under development. Our members have developed the best practices by consensus, so they reflect what a prudent and reasonable operator is doing out there today. They fill a regulatory void or exceed the regulatory standards, largely. They at least meet the regulatory standard, but they're also designed to fill the void and to exceed the standard.
The acid test for how successful those best practices will be is the willingness of Transport Canada to collaborate with the industry when they're developing and considering new regulatory initiatives. As we move to a different type of inspector and as we move to SMS, under which industry accepts more responsibility, we also expect to have more influence over the standards that govern our conduct. If we act responsibly and are developing new rules that reflect what a reasonable operator is doing out there, doesn't it make perfect sense for those standards to find their way into regulation that will govern our conduct?