So I'd say it's evolving, and we're moving in that direction, but it leads to your point about the prohibited items. There's a trend away from bad items toward bad people. We're looking less about the nail clippers and more about the behavioural piece and saying that maybe there's some demonstrated behaviours that suggest a person might be a higher risk than a lower risk.
To go back to your point about the frequent traveller secondary screening, I witnessed a similar experience on the way in, where an elderly gentleman was going through a double secondary with two pat-downs and two walk-throughs. What we're seeing here is an inefficient application of resources. It should be less on a person such as you, who are frequent travellers known to the carrier, known to the industry, versus somebody who is unknown and not a frequent traveller.