Allow me to address the scanners first.
First of all, I'm sure I can speak for Air Canada and the other NACC members when I say that we would not fly if we felt there was any security risk. We have confidence in the system, that they are screening to the point where we're satisfied that there are reasonable security levels.
In terms of the scanner itself and whatever new technologies may be coming, we're all for increased throughput and we would like to see technology be part of that strategy, particularly the newer levels that have less invasive, more efficient throughput, those sorts of things. That's a win-win, where you can maintain or enhance the level of security and increase the throughput.
The fact of the matter was that after the December event in the U.S., if we wanted to continue to fly to the U.S., we had to meet the U.S. measures. Keep in mind that scanners are just specifically for flights to the U.S. It was a necessary step toward ensuring security for our trips to the U.S., to continue services.
I'd like to think that if we could all step back and look again at the global network and ask, what's effective and what's efficient, and take a more methodical approach to it rather than a reactionary response, we'd find that we'd get more effective technology in place in the long run. It speaks to the behavioural analysis and that sort of thing.
The second one was....