Thank you.
Madame Bernier, you probably won't have any trouble with the government. We've already heard a couple of government members say that privacy issues are secondary to them as long as security is first. It's amazing, because one would have expected that an ideological position on the part of the members opposite might have strengthened their desire to protect individual rights.
On that issue, when the government put in a passenger protected program—and I see this is noted in one of your recommendations—they neglected to establish a mechanism for taking people off the no-fly list once they are on it. So while you focus on the official who is responsible for putting names on the list and delisting people, the fact of the matter is that the Minister of Transport is the only one who can take your name off the list. And he's not asking anybody at the Department of Homeland Security to take your name off the list, because he can't.
So what kind of privacy impact assessment can you possibly provide them when they decide--if they do--to use the Israeli system, which is predicated on knowing who everybody is who is actually going to go through Ben Gurion? It's not an impossible task, given that the population of Israel is less than that of the GTA and Toronto. Do a roll call and you'll find out who's not acceptable.