Yes.
I think, Mr. Chair, there's always a lot of leeway for what people can say or not say, and we try to stay away from statements that inflame passions of partisanship.
Ms. Whelan has not been a member of Parliament for some years. Minister Van Loan was an employee of the Ambassador Bridge. Last time I checked, Mr. Van Loan was still a member of cabinet. I did not mention his name. I did not talk about recusal. I did not talk about casting aspersions on people who do their jobs, and I don't think anybody around this table does.
I would ask you to ask Mr. Watson to stick to questions related to the decisions with respect to what Michigan did or did not do without talking about whether somebody lands softly or harshly after they have left public office. Otherwise, I guess we're going to have to ask how it is that a minister of the crown currently can recuse himself from a decision when you can only do that or only need to do that if you actually still have an interest in the decision that's being made.
So if Mr. Watson was wanting to raise a point of order so that we could again entertain the idea of bribery and corruption in this government, well, then, let's go ahead. Otherwise, let's be serious and ask the minister questions that are linked to the estimates.