With all due respect, you referred to Arizona, and Arizona's conditions are a lot better than the ones that you act for here. If there was a problem in Arizona, you should have expected a problem here in Canada.
You're asking this committee to think that climatic conditions in Canada are better than the ones in Arizona, and therefore you are going to make a determination--the word “determination”--about whether there is a safety defect that is contingent upon your scientific study, when your head office is already conducting such engineering studies worldwide...?