Evidence of meeting #21 for Transport, Infrastructure and Communities in the 40th Parliament, 3rd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was amendment.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Clerk of the Committee  Ms. Bonnie Charron

12:55 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

It's not relevant, Mr. Chair. It has nothing to do with this clause whatsoever.

12:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Merv Tweed

Excuse me, please, I would ask again that you address the amendment as amended, please--

June 3rd, 2010 / 12:55 p.m.

Liberal

Bonnie Crombie Liberal Mississauga—Streetsville, ON

Of course it does. The amendment--

12:55 p.m.

Liberal

Joe Volpe Liberal Eglinton—Lawrence, ON

A point of order, please.

12:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Merv Tweed

Mr. Volpe on a point of order.

12:55 p.m.

Liberal

Joe Volpe Liberal Eglinton—Lawrence, ON

I think it's fair to say, Mr. Chairman, that when we're looking at this amended amendment, we must make reference to subclause (1) of what we are amending. We're amending subclause 7(2). Now Mr. Bevington has asked for and received support for changing the word “cover” to “support”. It is our contention--and I believe I'm interpreting what Mrs. Crombie is saying correctly--that by using the word “support”, we're essentially reinforcing the principle and the law that's already been accepted by committee in subclause 7(1), and that nothing that we do from subclause 7(1) onward takes away from the ministerial responsibility to build and to maintain this monument. That's all Mrs. Crombie is doing.

I can't, for the life of me, understand why the parliamentary secretary would think that his amendment, amended, to subclause 7(2) is in any way not on topic, because we're dealing with all of clause 7.

1 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

On that point of order, Mr. Chair.

1 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Merv Tweed

Mr. Jean on the same point of order.

1 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

Yes, sir. Just to answer his question, the reason I keep doing it, Mr. Chair, is simply because the Liberals continue to filibuster this bill because they don't like what they have in front of them. They don't like the majority of the committee members who do listen to the Jewish community across Canada and who have decided to follow through with their wishes. That's why I keep bringing a point of order, because she's not relevant to the issue, and they're trying simply to delay this bill.

1 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Merv Tweed

Monsieur Laframboise on the same point of order.

1 p.m.

Bloc

Mario Laframboise Bloc Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel, QC

What is worse is that they can filibuster on a point of order. Now that is something!

1 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Merv Tweed

Order, please.

Again, for clarification of the committee members, the clause that we are dealing with, that has been subamended by Mr. Bevington reads:

The Council shall spearhead a fundraising campaign to support the cost of planning, designing, constructing, installing and maintaining the Monument, and any other costs incurred by the Council.

So relevance would be important, I think, if members were talking about the council and their role in this amendment.

Mr. Volpe.

1 p.m.

Liberal

Joe Volpe Liberal Eglinton—Lawrence, ON

I just want to get this right, because we want to be relevant. The parliamentary secretary says that any of our input in subclause 7(2) is not relevant because we've already established the principle, in subclause 7(1), that the Liberal Party really does support not only the Jewish community but all Canadians by making sure that the government, through the minister, is responsible for the construction and the maintenance of a monument. He thinks that's wrong. Is that what he's saying?

1 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Merv Tweed

I'm merely suggesting that subclause 7(2) refers directly to the council, not to the minister or government.

Mr. Jean.

1 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

Yes, it's on the same point of order.

On his point for clarification, what I'm trying to point out to the people listening, Mr. Chair, is that the Liberals are just simply trying to delay this bill and filibuster it. They're not listening to the Jewish community. I think that's ultimately what I'm trying to say.

1 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Merv Tweed

Thank you.

I would ask Mrs. Crombie to please continue again on subclause 7(2), which deals with the council.

1 p.m.

Liberal

Bonnie Crombie Liberal Mississauga—Streetsville, ON

Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

I just wanted to remind the committee that the Liberal Party is very supportive of constructing this monument and will stick to commenting solely on the relevance of subclause 7(2). However, we want to indicate that the parliamentary secretary continues to introduce new information with respect to a letter that was sent to the Jewish community, where he misrepresented facts. They signed under false pretense.

1 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

A point of order, Mr. Chair.

1 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Merv Tweed

Mr. Jean on a point of order.

1 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

I understand that Mrs. Crombie may wish to say things about my ability here in committee, and other things, but when she starts slandering me personally, Mr. Chair, I take offence at that. I'm doing my job, just like she is filibustering under orders from the Liberal caucus. I am doing my job trying to pass this bill, as I have orders under the Prime Minister to make sure this gets through, because this is what the Jewish community has identified they want. But that does not give her an excuse to slander me or to suggest that I have unethical motives, which she is. I would ask her to apologize for that and refrain from that in the future.

1 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Merv Tweed

Okay. I'm dealing on the same point of order with Mrs. Crombie.

1 p.m.

Liberal

Bonnie Crombie Liberal Mississauga—Streetsville, ON

I withdraw my remarks if, in any way, the parliamentary secretary felt that they were slanderous. I withdraw those remarks. My intent is to preserve--

1:05 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Merv Tweed

That's the point of order now. I think it's been resolved.

Again, Mrs. Crombie, I have to ask you to stay relevant to the amendment as subamended, as opposed to making criticisms of any part of this. We have to deal with the clause, and I would ask that we stay on the clause, please.

1:05 p.m.

Liberal

Joe Volpe Liberal Eglinton—Lawrence, ON

This is a point of order now.

1:05 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Merv Tweed

Mr. Volpe on a point of order.