Yes, but, Mr. Buda, I caught that point quite clearly. I'm asking you, though, in this particular instance, where for the first time ever there's an artificial hard deadline that municipalities wouldn't have dealt with before in such a rigid sense, whether you are saying that should be included as one of the things that municipalities should absorb. Your comments before seem to suggest that municipalities are always getting the unfair end of the stick, and therefore they might cover these costs too. Is that what you intended to say, or do you think they should be covered off on a flexible basis?
On June 15th, 2010. See this statement in context.