Absolutely.
My final question is this: in your analysis of that ,did you take into consideration what the cost of government is? Because of course when you cut taxes, that money just doesn't come to government. It doesn't have any filter that costs 20% or 25% of the money itself to implement any kind of strategy. In fact, it goes straight to the people who actually spend the money, and hence they get a better return on investment for themselves.
Did your analysis on the number of jobs created actually look at that and say that when you have a dollar that goes to the government, the government takes a cut to implement any kind of strategy, whereas if you cut the dollar in the taxes, people get to decide what they want to spend it on? Did you look at that analysis as far as job creation goes?