Yes, Mr. Chair. In clause 1, what we are doing is a clarification regarding the original clause 1 so that there is no uncertainty.
I'm sorry, Mr. Chair, but I've lost my notes here.
The installation of the definition of “library materials”.... My understanding is that there would be, with the original one that was proposed, the consistency to suggest that it includes...so it's not fully encompassing. In the original one, if memory serves me correctly at this stage, it says that “library materials” includes, etc. It is not totally inclusive. With this amendment, what we're trying to propose is that it would be totally inclusive, so it wouldn't just include, but it would be “means”.