I was just going to ask, if indeed Ms. Crombie would be interested in this, about leaving G-1 as the government proposal for providing for a reduced rate and then having a different section that invites Parliament to come back every 10 years to review the legislation. I mean, they can hear our discussions. We're interested in them reviewing it in relation to the definition and whether or not the rate should continue. But if we leave it that way, it doesn't give Canada Post any legal room to increase rates after any fixed period of time and Parliament still has exactly what Ms. Crombie wants, which is the review after 10 years. I'm just suggesting maybe the government is totally prepared to offer unanimous support to not waive the 48-hour notice for any amendment and to do that wherever you think appropriate.
On October 26th, 2010. See this statement in context.