Okay. I won't continue on that subject.
Let me shift to another subject, which is jobs. I was concerned that the information on jobs was so poor, in the sense that the Auditor General said different departments use different definitions, that the numbers were not terribly reliable, and she used words like “anecdotal”. So in contrast to signs, where there was meticulous detail, it seems that concerning the jobs, which is really what the program was for, we still don't have a clear picture of how many jobs were created or saved under this program. Why is that? Is that the case, and if so, why was more effort not expended to get accurate information on job creation?