Mr. Chair, I have a lot of respect for my colleague, Mr. Jean, except that in this case he's wrong.
Proposed subclause 10.1(3), outlined in amendment G-5, says very plainly:
“[...] it shall be laid before [...]”; it does not say that it has to be approved.
With what they want to do, it still reads:
Before a master plan is approved by the Governor in Council, it shall be laid before each House of Parliament.
The approval still remains with the Governor in Council. I feel that the approval should rest with both chambers.