I agree with Mr. Dhaliwal in relation to some of his points.
Monsieur Guimond, I've looked at this and I recommend a change on it that would make a lot more sense. I'll read the entire thing:
Pursuant to Standing Order 108(2), that the committee study the consequences of noise and other negative issues caused by airport operations in urban areas linked to the quality of life of the population and that it report its observations and recommendations, including recommendations related to an appropriate regulatory response, to the House.
Is that satisfactory to you? All I've done is change the words around, but it I think it has a much better meaning and it's much more clear and precise, in English, anyway.
If that's satisfactory, I see no problem with it not going forward and I'm prepared to agree to any date that you would like, Mr. Guimond, as long as it's outside of the normal course of our business here.