Thanks for all that you've said here. I think it's been most helpful in shedding some light on this. We know that the United States has sovereignty in its own airspace. This is a decision that they've made. If we want to fly over their airspace, this is their decision, not ours.
But I want to come back to something, Mr. Goldstein, that you talked about earlier. When I look at my role as a parliamentarian, I believe that part of my role is to be a forward-looking person. I try to avoid situations in which I am forced to react, but often by the time it comes to legislation we are reacting to something that's gone on in society.
You made a comment earlier about the need to move toward greater harmonization of security measures, and you talked about the perimeter they have in the EU. What would it look like for Canada and the United States to have a secure perimeter? Any thoughts on that? What does it look like in Europe? You said Germans don't feel any less German, or the French any less French. What have they done that we should be looking at as legislators to be forward-looking people and not always reactive?