My understanding is that one of the cornerstones of privacy protection in law is that the information can only be used for the purpose for which it was acquired. To the extent that an agency acquires information for its purposes, it cannot share it with other agencies, no matter how interesting it would be. That's one point.
Second, there is the ability to create some consent. The consent has to be in a context in which we don't expect people to consent to unreasonable aspects, such as unreasonable searches. Our problem is that this bill, to facilitate one process, seems to challenge fundamental issues in our privacy arrangements. It's not the owner of the information who decides when to give it. It's usually a supervised.... There's no monitoring. There is no time limit or space limit. That's our concern.