To my way of thinking--and I'm not an airport expert or an airline expert--the rest of the information would be known to the air carrier, because they couldn't, obviously, offer the services without that information and, as a result, they would be required by U.S. law to provide that information.
If we actually support Monsieur Guimond's amendment in this case, then we're not in compliance with U.S. law. As a result, the likelihood is that they would.... Even though we're making steps on this bill, if we limit it to not apply to U.S. law or to not be in compliance with U.S. law, they're not going to allow our aircraft through their airspace. That seems like a fairly straightforward situation, doesn't it?
Sorry, but the mike can't hear you nod.