But that's what makes it inadmissible, and we would have to deal with the LIB-3 amendment first and then go back to the subamendment. It would be a new amendment at that point.
Mr. McCallum.
On December 7th, 2010. See this statement in context.
On December 7th, 2010. See this statement in context.
December 7th, 2010 / 11:35 a.m.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Merv Tweed
But that's what makes it inadmissible, and we would have to deal with the LIB-3 amendment first and then go back to the subamendment. It would be a new amendment at that point.
Mr. McCallum.
See context to find out what was said next.