I'm not a lawyer either, and I will ask my colleague to supplement my comments.
Again, I would make a distinction in your interjection between the obligation that exists to include in the articles of continuance that the obligation has been met. That is all that ACPPA requires of Air Canada. The pursuant obligation rests with the shareholders and the arrangement between Air Canada and its shareholders.
In terms of the definition and interpretation of the legislation, once the legislation is in place, interpretation in terms of scope and meaning rests with the courts.
I cannot speak to whether or not there is already some jurisprudence in terms of that interpretation.