During the opening remarks, when we started the discussion, I think I explained that one of the challenges in an airport is to consider many differing aspects--there's a neighbourhood, people want to fly, they want airports to be convenient. Certainly the success of Toronto Island Airport is because of its location close to the centre of town. So understanding that there's an impact on the people in the local community, there are a lot of different vested interests. That's why we would require the consultation approach, involving all stakeholders, certainly for the national airport system's airports. The national airport system across the country is intended to address exactly that, to come up with the best solutions that meet everybody's needs.
I'm not sure if that particular requirement is part of Toronto Island's requirement or not. It is different. The same issues do exist, obviously, at a community level--there are people who want to use the airport; they want the convenience. I also understand that that particular airport has some very specific limits on the types of aircraft that can operate there. We know that Porter Airlines is operating some of the quietest prop aircraft that we have. So there are special circumstances there, I understand, but there are also some special considerations. In the development of Toronto Island Airport I believe they've gone some way to address that. So you are correct. I don't believe it is part of their lease.
With respect to the EU, I think we've seen a number of areas that the European Union is quite aggressive on--some areas environmentally, not just noise. Although it's always of interest to see what they're doing, we have to make sure we look at that in a Canadian context. That particular piece is really a policy piece, which is not my area of responsibility in terms of where we're going as a country. My specific responsibility is the safety aspect, and that does include the day-to-day noise operation, but noise policy on a more general level is not part of my responsibility.