I think it's important. In our consultation, players all had input...that they buy into this piece of legislation. If you're going to change the culture, everyone has to be part of it.
That's really the true intent of the bill. It's not to say “I caught you” because you didn't comply with something; it's about changing the culture and saving lives and equipment and so on and protecting our environment.
So we consulted widely. Stakeholders included the railway companies, industry associations, railway employees, the unions, railway customers and their associations, municipalities and their associations, provincial and territorial governments, aboriginal and environmental groups, emergency response groups, the public, Transport Canada, and other federal departments and agencies. I don't know whether I've missed anyone in Canada, but I think that covers pretty much everyone.
We have a tremendous amount of user support and interest support. In fact, I don't know anyone who is saying this is a bad idea, that we shouldn't be going here. The consultation is one thing. It is extensive and it is broad, but what is really most important is that people and both railways and those using the railways are saying that this is something that is overdue and that we should implement.