This has been an interesting exchange. The parliamentary secretary seems to be indicating that the axiom to “err on the side of caution” is not applicable in this particular circumstance, and that safety, when over-engineered, is not helpful to us. In fact, it appears that the argument is being made that if we have international aviation partners and destinations with less safe regimes than we have, we should adopt the less safe regimes.
Would that be a categorization of what you just heard, or would you agree or disagree with that?