My final question is in relation to the land governance issue. I know this is a big issue in my riding. In northern Alberta we have a lot of rail crossings. We have a lot of communities that are built up around the rail. I know that's something we can't avoid when the economy in those communities is so tightly linked to the railroads.
Really, you're asking us—to my mind—to interfere in provincial jurisdiction, municipal government jurisdiction, and the alarm bells go off whenever that happens, because obviously we have a balance of power in this country. That's the first thing I see. I do see a difficulty with that. As well, though, don't you think it would be better for you as the rail industry to go to each province and try to arrange some sort of agreement with them? That's my first question.
Second, do you not see some difficulty in relation to this, if there is an obligation on the municipality to advise you within 300 metres of a rail line? My goodness gracious, in Lac La Biche, for instance, or Slave Lake, every single thing that goes on in the city or in the community has to go to you. Every single building in Lac La Biche is within 300 metres, I would say, of a rail line, for instance. So every time anybody wants to build anything, they have to send you notice. That just seems so onerous.
Are you prepared, every time you do something on your tracks that may affect someone around you—such as a business around you—to give them notice of that?