Sir, we agree with that as well. The key, as was mentioned a few moments ago, is to do a full assessment of these crossings: risk, benefit to the public, whether there is other easy access for the public or the landowner so that they can get across.
One of the reasons for the success of the program in the U.S. is that it takes a very holistic view of crossings over a particular stretch of territory. Can we close three, upgrade two to a higher level of safety, and then improve safety and maintain convenience to the public? It's very much an individual case.
But there are accidents at both types of crossings.