I'll continue with the 300-metre restriction that you're trying to impose. I come from an engineering, land surveying, and planning perspective. The city I come from, Surrey Delta, used to get notice within half a kilometre of a development, but to me it seemed like us putting fines and imposing costs on the local government. It doesn't make sense to me. I think those issues can be resolved between the railway companies and those municipalities or the provincial government, whatever works for you. To me, 300 metres seems to be very...it doesn't make sense to me. The thing is that within 300 metres there would be hardly any development, neither residential nor commercial. So I don't see that.
If I see a railway corridor, it's all about development. The development has to go around that corridor, so that's what I have some issues with.