I think I'm understanding the point you're making a little more. You have no concern with regard to the 300 metres specifically. You're concerned about the understanding, the constitutional reality, that municipalities are a creation of the province and therefore there's a jurisdictional difference.
It may be difficult to make that full argument, in that railways, of course, are federally regulated, so there is some overlap. I'm not a constitutional expert, nor do I want to begin the debate. It's interesting. I'll maybe have to remind my FCM representatives who come to my office next time that, no, they should be speaking only to the province. I say that in jest.
I understand what you're saying and that it's a concern. Would you be uncomfortable if any requirement were included in this legislation that would involve municipalities at all, because it's coming from the federal level? Is everything off the table because this is a federal regulation and therefore if it impacts municipalities it should be...? Is it the position of FCM that it's something the federal government shouldn't touch and therefore shouldn't legislate on if it impacts municipalities?