I really appreciate what you said earlier about how you have been working with the Railway Association and talking about protocol and best practices. To me, this gets back to that. Why can't you determine with the railroad what they would think would be reasonable?
As I say, I still think there needs to be some sort of guideline as far as the distance from the right-of-way and the development of the land use within that right-of-way are concerned if the railroad is going to be responsible for the safety of that right-of-way. For instance, developing a high-traffic public area across a rail where there's going to have to be a higher load on the crossing is an issue the railroad is going to have to deal with. For a municipality, I don't think it would be reasonable for them to allow that kind of development without first notifying the railroad.