Just to follow up on what Mr. Laframboise mentioned, I want to make it clear that I don't think the railroad should have the right to tell you whether or not you can have a development. I think they need to work with you. I think they need to be notified, and there needs to be a determination of what that area of notification is. I wasn't suggesting that your jurisdiction would be trumped by the railroad as far as development on municipal or regional land goes.
There's another area that concerned me when I first saw the act. You haven't mentioned it, and I just want to know if you've talked to the railroad about it. Under the act, the railroad has to file an emergency response plan. My experience with regional government is that the regional government would put together an emergency response plan for their area, including the railroad.
Of course, you don't collect any taxes on the railroad right-of-way--at least they don't in British Columbia--so the community is providing the service, because the railroad is not going to have people all the way along the main line who are ready to respond to an emergency. They're going to rely on the local government or the regional governments to have that plan.
My concern was if that was going to be provided by the local government, they should be paying for that, especially if they're going to incorporate that in their plan, and they have to have a plan to get their running licence. Did you discuss any of those issues with the railroad association?