I think Air Canada is a special case because of the legislation. In the legislation, government required that these maintenance jobs be in three locations in Canada. Now, because the owner is Aveos and Air Canada is only a minority owner, the letter of the legislation may not apply anymore. But I think the spirit of the legislation is that Air Canada's maintenance facilities should be in Canada, not South America.
I don't think you really answered my question. In order to guarantee that these jobs remain in Canada, would you entertain some legislative amendment to the act that would ensure that?
As I understand it, some of these workers are planning to stay on with Air Canada rather than going with Aveos, even though they may not have a job. But they will at least have their pensions. Whereas if they go to Aveos, they are concerned their jobs will disappear after two years.
Even though it's two years from now, it's having a real impact on people's lives as we speak. My question is, would you consider a legislative fix to guarantee that Air Canada maintenance jobs don't leave the country in two years' time?