Yes, Mr. Chair.
I beg to be corrected if I'm wrong, but I understand that what we're doing in this case is adding the word “company” so that it would specifically state that it would be a “company supervisor”, and not, for instance, as Mr. Julian might put it, the ability to farm out.
We want to make sure--under both (a) and (b)--that a company supervisor is the person doing the work that is necessary.
Is that correct, Mr. Bourdon?