No, but you did, actually. I do understand that we are having a little bit of a conversation here. I feel bad if you think I might be harassing witnesses. That's not my style, and you know that, because you monitor every single one of our meetings.
In terms of my scepticism and my willingness to try to get to something, you've suggested in this, as you have in the past, that Transport Canada needs to be there on the ground with inspectors. You've heard this committee, through some of the members, especially on this side of the table, say that you must have to inspectors on the ground. If Transport Canada was cutting back—and we found that it was cutting back on inspectors—then we needed to know about it.
When we found out about it, we put pressure on the minister and the department. You heard the department say yesterday they were rehiring 60 inspectors on an urgent basis and were going to fill the full complement of--what was it?--96 inspectors, of which they were short. I don't mean to be antagonistic, but are you suggesting that they're not being entirely truthful?