What I hear when you tell me those things, Madam Tadros, is that you are unconvinced that government--this government, because that's the one we're talking about now--is capable of listening to the evidence.
For example, when a plane gets off the runway--you said there were 129 incidents--when there are fatalities from planes that come down, when you talk about train derailments that happen excessively, with greater frequency, and there are injuries and fatalities associated with them, when you talk about the number of marine accidents with vessels on a monthly basis, I don't know how much more evidence one would require than seeing a corpse or a mangled body as an indication that there is a problem. And pardon me for being so blunt. I'm hearing you tell me that government is always responding, that this government is always responding with the issue that perhaps it is a human error, i.e., the fault of the operator. Otherwise, what purpose will the other evidence provide you?