We drove our revenue cost ratio in the 1990s from 68% to 84% as a result of raising fares, cutting service, and cutting staff. That was really to respond to a pretty bad economy in the 1990s. It was 84% then, and I think that's too high. I don't think that's enough investment for a big city like Toronto to have in transit; it means that people can't get around the city on transit.
When the official plan was brought forward in 2002, it was really a pro transit plan. We invested. We've spent a lot of money on transit in the last five or six years, and we drove the revenue cost ratio down to about 70%. I think that's a bit too low for Toronto. I think somewhere between 70% and 75% is the right answer for the city of Toronto.
It's going to vary in other cities, and in smaller cities. I think you're going to speak to Saskatoon later this afternoon. You can ask them that question. That would be an unrealistic expectation for them. Big cities like Toronto, in my opinion, should be in the order of 70% to 75%.