I'll take the first response and let my colleagues add to it.
That's why I am such a champion of the road map approach: because it involves—as in the case of electric vehicles, for example, or in the case of natural gas, the two I've left for your consideration today—the OEMS, the original equipment manufacturers.
The electric vehicle one involves the utilities, so we know they are thinking about what the electricity draw is and whether they are going to be able to meet it if in fact there are electric vehicles in every garage. The full value chain of the economic sector is involved in the discussion. If we're talking about an OEM like GM or Ford, they're not going to spend money working on the introduction of electric vehicles unless they're going to introduce electric vehicles.
By taking that approach, you focus the Canadian government investment on the gap that may exist, whether it be codes and standards or whatever the actual specific might be that comes out of that road map area, and you look at the federal role in the innovation system so that Government of Canada dollars are invested only in a Government of Canada role but within the context of something that will be used.
I take your question very seriously in the context of whether we should be investing and where. When we respond in that fashion, there is a much higher likelihood that the technology that gets developed will be implemented in the marketplace.