We're getting a little bit too specific for the question.
One of the concerns I have about these programs is that often they fund pilot projects and demonstration projects, but because they are not commercially viable, they never take root or become broadly used anywhere. I think, for example, of the enormous resources the federal government invested in hydrogen fuel cell technology. The latest reading I've done on that technology said that isolating the hydrogen fuel consumes more electricity than the fuel itself produces. I'm not aware of anywhere in the world where hydrogen fuel cell technology is commercially viable on its own, even after all of those massive public investments.
When we have these distortions of government spending of other people's money on ideas, that money goes to things that lack commercial viability and therefore never become widely used. How do you respond to that?