It could be done. It's a question of reflecting a continuity of programming. I'll just say, for example, the largest of the programs is SADI. This is a continuity of programming that reaches back to the program prior to Technology Partnerships Canada. Prior to that was the defence industry productivity program. Over the history of that program and support—for example, to aerospace in particular—the question would be what technologies, developed by the companies that have been supported, are now in products that have had market or commercial success and are producing revenues or jobs in Canada.
The question would be, how far back can we go? In the case of SADI, because it's a newer initiative, all of the projects that we've supported under SADI are now in the research and development phase. We will track, once they move to commercial phase one, whether they're repaying us. This would be an indicator of success: the company has revenues and they're repaying the government for the funding provided.
Second, we will track the success of the technology as it's inserted into their products downstream, so in order to provide some attribution of commercial success, we'd have to actually go back beyond the current program.