There are several areas of innovation, some of which were so innovative that the U.S. safety administration has taken them on as regulations to make sure that it was a level playing field for all—for example, in electronic stability control. You had anti-lock braking before, but with the computerization, you could actually program the vehicles to have crash avoidance capability in some bad driving situations.
That is one extension above the crashworthiness. You want to avoid the crash as well as protect the occupants. It is multi-faceted. At Chrysler in Windsor, we have a development tunnel for headlighting. There's a specific research facility there. You can expand the technologies of high-intensity lighting—patterning, efficiencies, even new technologies. That is being looked at there.
Another one that seems to be coming fast, in my view, and being talked about more in the U.S. than in Canada, is autonomous vehicles, vehicles that drive themselves. This is good for improving congestion on highways, where vehicles can talk together, work together, and mass-move transportation together most efficiently, with lower crash risk. There are a lot of things out there.
The technology's there. The issue is now just in how we are going to package it and what the research capabilities are to find out what we need to do in a North American context. This is an exciting area we're getting into.
Yes, there are lots of areas.