Thank you.
My question is along the lines of Mr. Poilievre's. Is it the Transport Canada certification that is the barrier? What is the barrier that would make it difficult for a company that has discovered or has proven that a certain technology works?
I'll use an example that I know very well, trucks. We know European trucks have side guards that, because it's aerodynamics, reduce greenhouse gases. The fuel reduction is about 10% on average, some are even at 20%, depending on the design. That's just one example. There are many other types of examples.
What is the barrier? Is it the certification of Transport Canada, or is it the lack of manufacturing in Canada, or is it synchronizing it with the U.S. market? In this case there's no manufacturer in Canada that does it. It's mostly European. It's German, Dutch, etc.
What is it precisely? I've heard from both of your presentations that you're saying people are not working together. Your line, I think, Mr. Dennis, is that it's not in the market yet, so we should wait. You said why fight over a market that doesn't exist yet, versus working together to create conditions for a market that they could participate in. What are those conditions that would create the market? Is it Transport Canada or the minister saying that a technology works and then providing some initial funding? What kinds of barriers are in your way?
I know it's a vague question, but both of your presentations did not zero in on the precise problem.