It's a good question. It's something that I think would warrant discussion among the committee.
There are different criteria or triggers that the federal government could institute, if that's what it wishes. For instance, you could set a minimum farebox recovery rate for any project.
Has the federal government done that in the past? No, it hasn't. The only thing we require from our partners right now is that they commit that they will cover the operating losses in their totality. To the extent that they're willing to do that, then the federal government doesn't interfere.
But could the federal government, if it wanted, say that it would not invest in any transit system that doesn't recover 60% of its operating costs? Absolutely. That's an option the government of the day could decide. There are pluses and minuses to that. Obviously the pluses would be that you tend to be building the larger subway systems and transit systems, but you would probably more or less automatically exclude anything outside of cities of any size.