So, Benoît Bouchard and Don Mazankowski wrote the act, presented it and made the case for it. Mr. Bouchard has been quoted publicly, he has said himself that the intention of the act was clear, and you are coming to a different interpretation today.
How can you justify a different interpretation, not only from that of the Minister of Transport at the time of privatization, but also that of the Minister of Transport who was in place last year and who had the same interpretation as Mr. Bouchard had at the time?