With respect, I'm going to disagree.
The essence of this decision was whether Air Canada could contract its work out to Aveos, and not Air Canada itself. The judge's ruling was that as long as Aveos was doing the line maintenance work on behalf of Air Canada in Winnipeg, Montreal, and to a certain extent Toronto, that in itself was compliance. It didn't matter whether those employees were employees of Air Canada, provided that the work continued to be done. The judge didn't say anywhere in this decision that if the work disappears, if Aveos closes, they'll still be in compliance. That's not said anywhere in that decision.