That requires a very long answer.
Really it should tie into the industry norm, the 30 to 90 days of the capital markets. At that point, there's a litmus test that this is either a go or a no go project. The challenge is that the government has to satisfy its mandate and be responsible with the funds it provides, and that's understood. It's in contrast to the requirement of the commercialization, or the industry, which moves at a faster speed than government. One is not better than the other; there's just a misalignment.
Anything that can draw the process down, or a program that can facilitate earmarked projects, however broadly defined that may or may not be, to fast track, for lack of a better term, into that would be seen as favourable, because it matches the reality that companies need to address commercial problems and challenges in the market and they can't wait to address them. If they do, that window of opportunity may close and foreign competitors may take that opportunity.