To go back to what our ask is in terms of regulation, in time, as Todd said, we can get there, but the legislation does not allow any opportunity for a reprieve to allow us that time to get there.
Right now the limit on sulphur is 15 parts per million. We can get to under 100 parts per million, down from a fuel that is currently being burned at 3,500 to 5,000, sometimes even 6,000, parts per million. One might ask why not simply ban the burning of used oil if it's so nasty. Sulphur is not the only thing in it. I can provide you with a whole list of really nasty things that go into our atmosphere and therefore into the water table, like acid rain, like asthma-causing gases, like carcinogens, that pollute our land and water. Basically we want to create an alternative for those industries without banning it.
The Province of Ontario actually tried to ban the burning of used oil. There was some pushback from stakeholders in that industry, who said “You can't ban it; you don't have a solution for us to do anything with it. If you ban the burning of waste oil, what happens to it? It simply builds up in inventory. You haven't provided a solution.” So they had to back off from their legislation and they exempted industry, agriculture, and all northern communities, because those industries and those communities won't have anything to do with it.
We're asking for not necessarily a change in regulation, but an opportunity to have a regulation that will allow us to ask for either an exemption—I don't know what the mechanism is, whether it's a ministerial exemption—