I have just a couple of points.
We operate in many different jurisdictions with many different regulatory environments, so I think we're well positioned to adapt ourselves and offer options, regardless of the regulatory environment that is in place in countries in which we do business. In some places, there are more stringent environmental regulations, and we can cope with them.
Certainly—and I've made this point—we would put forward the view that there's scope here in Canada to encourage in public procurement the greater use of smart and clean technologies, but I think it has to be done in a way that risks are managed and by being conscious that you want to provide the best value for taxpayers.
On free trade, I made the point that exports are very important for us, but in the rail transit business it's very decentralized, because the business model is very much around specific projects. I mentioned the challenge with the local content requirements we're faced with everywhere in the world, which compel us to localize our production to a great degree.
Free trade is important because a lot of benefits can be derived from free trade agreements. For instance, for a global company like Bombardier, anything that facilitates business mobility would be very helpful to us, and anything that facilitates exports of goods and services would be very helpful to us. But in general, in the free trade agreements that the Canadian government negotiates, I think we would advocate for a balanced outcome with genuine reciprocity.