Unless I hear any dissension, I'm going to ask for a friendly amendment to the amendment, which would basically change it from being just another meeting to adding two extra hours.
Is there any further discussion on the amendment?
Evidence of meeting #50 for Transport, Infrastructure and Communities in the 41st Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was tax.
A recording is available from Parliament.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Larry Miller
Unless I hear any dissension, I'm going to ask for a friendly amendment to the amendment, which would basically change it from being just another meeting to adding two extra hours.
Is there any further discussion on the amendment?
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Larry Miller
Okay. Call the vote, please.
(Amendment negatived: nays 6; yeas 5)
I declare the amendment defeated.
Is there any further discussion on the main motion? I'm going to call the question.
Conservative
Liberal
Liberal
Denis Coderre Liberal Bourassa, QC
Does Ms. Chow's motion address the request submitted to us by the Standing Committee on Finance ?
If that is the case, I don't know why we should hold this vote, since we only have to vote for...
What I'm saying is that regardless of the motion, it's already in the letter of Chair Rajotte. Why do we want a motion on that if we already have it? Is it just to make the news?
Liberal
Denis Coderre Liberal Bourassa, QC
All I'm asking is why we can't support this letter as a motion that's included in what Olivia wants to study. It's already in.
Conservative
Liberal
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Larry Miller
I'm going to call the recorded vote.
(Motion negatived: nays 6; yeas 5)
We now move on to the fourth report of the subcommittee on agenda and procedure.
Does everybody—