Thank you for the question.
To answer the second part first, on the amendments, I would hope that's where it gets us to, to our idea of what the act did have in it. An example I gave is that any time we had a municipality doing a bridge project in the Province of Saskatchewan, we had to have approval from the Navigable Waters Protection Act on any work we did on any bridge.
I can give numerous examples to this committee of bridges that are 50 or 60 years old and are not used for navigation in any shape or form. When we look at bridge replacements of over half a million dollars per bridge on these waterways that only flow for three to six weeks in the spring, to us it becomes very expensive and very outdated to have to do that. We can do the same thing with steel pipe and still respect the environment. I will assure this committee that many people in rural Canada and rural Saskatchewan who I will speak for will make sure they do that. We will do that.