No, and I appreciate that question. It actually allows me to elaborate a little bit on the earlier question.
There is an understanding that we are moving to a new regime and that there are going to be a lot of changes. We don't have it completely 100% mapped out at this point. What we do have is a lot of support from our stakeholders, from what the bill describes.... What we plan on doing as we move to a different regime is to create a series of different publications for public consumption, to describe for builders what their obligations are around protecting the common law, and also what the rights are for boaters. Boaters and builders have been operating in shared waterways for centuries, long before this act came into force in 1882, and they will be long after these amendments are changed by another set of amendments.
We do have a bunch of material that we're going to publish. Our officers are not going away in the short term. They're going to be there to respond to questions in listed waterways or in unlisted waterways.
I have two quick last points. One is that there is a provision for builders to opt in, if they are going to infringe on the common law. It does create some certainty for both builders and boaters. There is an opt-in provision in the bill. The second is that the list of waterways is a schedule to the act. It can be amended in the future by a Governor in Council, by order in council regulation.